Demonstration — illustrative, not a historical claim

ETL, Data Quality & Governance

A financial organization ingests data from multiple SQL Server systems and flat files. Data arrives with inconsistencies, schema drift, and no automated quality checks or anomaly detection. This demonstrates an end-to-end pipeline that builds trust in.

Executive Summary

I demonstrate a staging → validation → warehouse → semantic-layer pipeline orchestrated with Python and Azure Data Factory. Logging tables track row counts, null checks, referential integrity, and schema drift; an AI anomaly-detection step (Isolation Forest / statistical outliers) flags unusual patterns; and a governance dashboard consumes those logs to show quality trends, lineage, and SLA compliance.

4 stages
Staging → semantic
96.4%
Composite quality score (illustrative)
AI
Isolation-Forest anomaly gate
−70%
Manual QA effort (illustrative)

01 Problem — example scenario

A financial organization ingests data from multiple SQL Server systems and flat files. Data arrives with inconsistencies, schema drift, and no automated quality checks or anomaly detection. Bad rows reach reporting before anyone notices, and QA is manual and reactive.

02 Constraints

03 Architecture — ETL pipeline

Every stage writes to logging tables, and the validation + anomaly gate sits between the warehouse and the semantic layer so only trusted data is published.

IngestADF · Python
Stagingraw landing
Validate + AI GateDQ checks · anomalies
Warehouseconformed
Semantic Layergoverned · RLS

04 AI anomaly detection — Python

An Isolation Forest scores each batch for outliers; flagged rows are quarantined and surfaced to the governance dashboard rather than silently loaded.

anomaly_gate.pyPython
from sklearn.ensemble import IsolationForest
import pandas as pd

def score_batch(df: pd.DataFrame, features: list) -> pd.DataFrame:
    """Flag statistical outliers before load. Conservative contamination."""
    model = IsolationForest(
        n_estimators=200,
        contamination=0.01,
        random_state=42,
    )
    scores = model.fit_predict(df[features])
    df["is_anomaly"] = (scores == -1)
    return df

# flagged rows are written to dq.AnomalyLog and moved to a quarantine table

05 Data-quality scorecard

The pipeline scores four dimensions plus an anomaly rate; the composite feeds the governance dashboard and the SLA report (values illustrative).

Completeness
99.1%
Consistency
97.8%
Timeliness
92.5%
Referential Integrity
99.6%
Anomaly Rate
0.8%

06 Governance dashboard

A single pane consumes pipeline logs and anomaly output to show quality trends and SLA compliance. Filter by source, hover the charts for values, or select a source to drill through to the anomaly log. Illustrative data.

Data Governance · Pipeline Health SOURCE · ALL SOURCES
Data-Quality Score by Dimension %
12-Run Quality Trend %
Anomalies by Type share
Composite Quality Score target 98.0%

07 Solution demonstration

The example system combines pipeline engineering with governance:

08 Outcome — demonstration

This example shows how combining ETL + quality + governance can, in practice:

← Previous02 · SQL Performance & Modeling Next →04 · SSRS Modernization